
HIPAA for minors is one of the more complicated rule sets for compliance professionals to understand. Teams have to balance parents’ rights, minors’ privacy, state consent rules, custody disputes, and safety concerns.
In December 2025, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued a Dear Colleague letter on the HIPAA Privacy Rule and parental access for minors’ medical records. The letter highlights improper denials of parental access and frames parental access as an enforcement priority.
For privacy and compliance officers, this is a clear signal. Parental access workflows related to HIPAA for minors need a fresh review.
This article breaks down how HIPAA treats parental access for minors’ medical records and what that means for your practice.
The HIPAA Privacy Rule sets national standards for how covered entities use, disclose, and protect protected health information (PHI). It also gives individuals rights over their health information, including the right of access.
HIPAA allows a “personal representative” for minors to exercise those rights. Under HHS’s guidance on personal representatives, a person who has authority under applicable law to make health care decisions for minors must generally be treated as that individual for HIPAA purposes, subject to specific exceptions.
For an unemancipated minor, HIPAA usually defers to a parent or legal guardian. This is reflected in 45 C.F.R. § 164.502(g).
HIPAA does not define who counts as a parent or guardian for a minor. It defers to state laws or other relevant laws on who has the authority to make their care decisions. That is why you cannot interpret HIPAA in isolation from your jurisdiction’s consent and minor custody rules.
What this means for compliance:
Most of the time, parents have a default right under HIPAA to access their minor child’s records. HHS’s FAQ on personal representatives and minors explains that the Privacy Rule generally allows a parent to access their child’s medical records as the child’s personal representative, as long as that access is not inconsistent with state or other applicable law.
In practice, this usually includes the right to:
For compliance teams, this default is the starting point. Staff should assume parents with decision-making authority generally do have access, unless a specific HIPAA exception or state law applies.

The rules around HIPAA for minors can feel abstract until they show up in an OCR press release. These enforcement actions sit inside the broader HIPAA landscape you manage every day.
For a wider view of how access, exchange, and disclosure errors turn into penalties, explore our guides on HIPAA Compliance and Medical Records Exchange and HIPAA ROI Compliance Fundamentals.
Here are three examples where parental access issues around a minor’s medical records led to HIPAA settlements.
Children’s Hospital & Medical Center in Omaha, a pediatric provider, paid $80,000 to resolve a potential HIPAA Right of Access violation. This occurred after a parent complained that she could not obtain her deceased minor daughter’s full medical record.
According to the OCR settlement notice for CHMC, the hospital provided only part of the requested information. The hospital then took more than six months to supply the remaining records, which were stored in another division.
B. Steven L. Hardy, D.D.S., LTD, doing business as Paradise Family Dental in Las Vegas, paid $25,000 after OCR found a potential HIPAA Right of Access violation involving a mother’s requests for her own and her minor child’s records.
OCR’s Paradise Family Dental resolution page explains that the mother submitted multiple record requests between April and December 2020. The practice did not provide the records until December 31, 2020, more than eight months after the initial request.
In 2023, OCR announced a $15,000 settlement with Pennsylvania psychotherapist David Mente, MA, LPC. The OCR resolution agreement for Mente describes a 2017 HIPAA complaint alleging that Mente refused to provide a father with access to his three minor children’s PHI.
OCR provided technical assistance, but a second complaint in 2018 reported continued failure to provide the records.
These cases show that when parents act as personal representatives for their minor children, delays, partial responses, or unnecessary barriers to access can cause HIPAA enforcement issues.
HIPAA includes several narrow exceptions where a parent is not treated as a minor’s personal representative for certain PHI. These exceptions usually involve sensitive services or situations where someone other than the parent controls care.
For compliance officers, these exceptions mark the highest-risk scenarios for OCR complaints, inconsistent staff decisions, and portal misconfigurations.
In many states, minors can consent to some services on their own. Depending on state law, examples can include:
When a minor is allowed under state law to consent to a service without a parent and does so, HIPAA generally treats the minor, not the parent, as the decision-maker for PHI related to that episode of care.
In those circumstances, the parent is not the minor’s personal representative for that subset of information under HIPAA.
The exception is narrow. It usually applies only to PHI related to that specific care, not the entire record. Parents still have access rights to other information, such as vaccines, well-child visits, imaging, and non-sensitive labs.
Sometimes a court or a government agency directs or authorizes a minor’s care, such as:
When a court or agency has authority to make health care decisions for specific services, the parent may not be the minor’s personal representative under HIPAA for PHI related to that care. Instead, the court or agency may control access for that portion of the record.
This does not mean parents automatically lose access to everything. It means parental rights may be limited for PHI associated with court- or agency-directed services.
A parent can agree to a confidential relationship between the minor and the provider under HIPAA. For example, a parent might say, “I want my teenager to be able to talk freely. You do not have to tell me everything from these sessions.”
HIPAA permits the provider to treat the parent as not the minor’s personal representative for PHI within the scope of that confidential relationship. The boundaries should be clear:
Providers should document the agreement in the record so HIM, front desk, and portal support teams can apply it consistently.
HIPAA also includes a safety valve for situations involving abuse, neglect, or serious risk for minors.
Under 45 C.F.R. § 164.524 and related provisions, a covered entity may decide not to treat a person as a personal representative if it reasonably believes the individual has been or may be subjected to domestic violence, abuse, or neglect by that person, or that treating the person as a personal representative could endanger the individual, and the decision is consistent with the individual’s best interests.
In these cases, organizations should have clear internal workflows for:
Parents often ask, “What do I actually need to do to get my child’s records?” Clear guidance here reduces confusion for families and staff.
Here is a simple process you can share with parents and build into your workflows:
For compliance and HIM leaders, parental access is where policy, technology, and human judgment collide. When requests run through email, fax, and ad hoc tracking, it’s challenging to apply the right rule every time or prove you did.

ChartRequest helps close that gap by turning parental medical records requests into a structured, auditable process:
If you want to see what this looks like in practice, schedule a personalized consulation to review your current workflows, identify risk points, and explore how standardized ROI processes can support compliant parental and minor access at scale.
Most of the time, yes. When a parent has legal authority to make health care decisions for a minor, HIPAA generally treats that parent as the child’s personal representative with access rights, unless a narrow exception applies. Many complaints arise when staff apply those exceptions too broadly or inconsistently, so clear policy language and scenario-based training are essential.
HIPAA does not set a single age. It defers to state law on when minors can consent to specific services without a parent, such as STI testing, contraception, or certain mental health treatment. When that happens, the minor often controls access to PHI related to those services, even though the parent remains the personal representative for most other care.
Parents can ask for a written explanation, request review by your privacy or compliance officer, and clarify which HIPAA or state rule is being applied to deny access to the minor’s medical records. If the issue is not resolved, they may file a HIPAA complaint with OCR.